How Is Your Board Owning Digital Infrastructure Security (and Personal Liability) Under NIS 2?
The era of hoping for the best in digital infrastructure security ended the moment NIS 2 made personal liability for directors explicit and operational. Today, board-level engagement in cyber resilience isn’t just advisory-it’s actively tracked, evidenced, and subject to regulatory and legal scrutiny. The onus is not on whether your board “cares” about cyber-security, but whether it can demonstrate direct stewardship, timely resource allocation, and data-driven decision-making at any moment. A passing reference to “cyber” in annual minutes has become as dangerous as silence.
Leadership’s silence is now the loudest risk signal. True oversight is seen in hard evidence, not hope.
Boards are now expected to weave security into routine governance, aligning oversight with real, operating controls. Every strategic action-approval of budgets, assignment of asset owners, risk responses-must be minuted, reviewed, and digitally signed within your Information Security Management System (ISMS). Gone are the days of annual static PDFs and singular committee sign-off: NIS 2 and modern auditors expect dynamic, versioned records chronicling ongoing risk reviews, contract decisions, and management reviews.
The expectations extend far beyond symbolic endorsement:
- Regular review of asset registers: and risk maps, with outcomes logged and named.
- Clear accountability: Each critical asset, supplier, or risk is mapped to a specific executive, director, or committee.
- Versioned evidence: Approvals, improvement actions, and reviews are tracked in real time, forming a living audit trail that scales with business growth and regulatory pace.
| Board Expectation | Operationalisation | ISO 27001 / Annex A Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Prove oversight & leadership | ISMS approval, minuted review, named owners | 5.2, 5.3, A5.1, A5.36 |
| Show comprehensive asset coverage | Asset inventory, assignments, timestamped reviews | 5.9, 5.12, A5.9, A5.12 |
| Control implementation evidence | Versioned SoA, assignment logs, change traceability | 8.1, 8.32, A8.1, A8.32 |
| Demonstrate resilience & improvement | Live KPIs, management review cycles, audit logs | 9.1, 9.3, A5.27, A5.36 |
| Incident/response documentation | Incident log, event handling, lessons learned | 5.26, 10.2, A5.24, A5.26 |
Traceability in action: Imagine a director flags concern over third-party risk at the board. That triggers a risk register update, logged under A5.9, visible in ISMS.online as a new entry. A regulator requests proof of ownership, triggering an export showing the board decision, assigned control, timestamp, and current status. When a KPI is missed, a corrective action plan is logged under A5.36, traceable to the meeting and owner.
Evidence is your shield-when expectations rise, hope is not a plan.
Board accountability under NIS 2 is a new standard for digital leadership-one where operational evidence is the best witness, and digital resilience is proven, not presumed.
Why Do Digital Infrastructure Breaches Still Escape Core Controls?
Even as frameworks and standards proliferate, preventable breaches outpace compliance rituals. Most security failures in digital infrastructure aren’t the result of sophisticated technical assaults, but the gaps left by human complacency, shallow supply chain oversight, and audit processes that capture yesterday’s state-not today’s reality.
Most compliance penalties under NIS 2 have originated not in technical compromise, but untracked supply chain risk. (Deloitte 2025)
Digital infrastructure hinges on a web of suppliers and cloud providers. When asset inventories and control reviews exist only as snapshots, blind spots emerge: an unregistered shadow SaaS, a supplier that failed to notify of personnel changes, a contract renewal that went unreviewed. Although paper-based audits may once have satisfied external reviewers, NIS 2 authorises surprise scrutiny-forcing organisations to produce live, up-to-date logs, change histories, and risk actions on demand.
- Inherited risk: When core controls are not extended to your vendor ecosystem, a breach or unauthorised change can flow into your own digital estate, unnoticed and untracked.
- Fragmented visibility: Multiple departments update infrastructure, but asset and event logs rarely converge, causing critical systems or risks to be missed or duplicated.
- Audit fatigue and staleness: Staff often compile evidence in the days before a scheduled audit, but as regulatory audits become surprise-based, this approach quickly collapses. The result? Remediation culture-fixing only what’s visible, not what’s risky.
Human elements remain central. ENISA’s threat landscape reports routinely attribute more than half of major cyber incidents to human error: missed alert, training fatigue, delayed patching, or incomplete handovers. Without embedded, measured processes for user education, retraining, and incident follow-up, even well-mapped technical controls risk irrelevance.
Audits are now designed as reality checks, not ceremonial hurdles. The only reliable defence is an ISMS that integrates asset management, supply chain visibility, and evidence capture-automating reminders, detecting gaps, and surfacing risks before they harden into vulnerabilities or fines.
Master NIS 2 without spreadsheet chaos
Centralise risk, incidents, suppliers, and evidence in one clean platform.
Which NIS 2 Requirements Are Most Practically Challenging for Operations?
For operational teams, NIS 2’s most difficult demand isn’t documentation-it’s continuous, real-time mapping of risk, ownership, and evidence. The luxury of “audit scramble” windows is gone; now, system accountability is measured in real-time exports, clear SoA-version alignment, and live improvement logs.
Regulators expect a clearly defined Statement of Applicability, with controls traceable to risk register and management review over time.
Key practical challenges include:
-
Integrated Change Tracking: Every significant alteration-supplier engagement, asset onboarding, policy change-must be logged instantly and tied to a living risk register. Ad hoc spreadsheets no longer satisfy scrutiny; changes must be assigned, timestamped, and actioned with a clear outcome.
-
SoA and Evidence Reuse: It’s not enough to have a Statement of Applicability; it must evolve with every organisational, regulatory, or technical change. Teams must map fresh evidence to every control revision, avoid duplication, and link each update to current risks.
-
Continuous Management Review: NIS 2 expects regular management review cycles, not placeholder meetings. Documentation must show progress against known gaps, outcomes of improvement actions, and how board input closes the loop from leadership to audit readiness.
-
Human Error and Fatigue Management: Training logs, incident response records, and completion rates now form part of the required control environment. Post-incident reviews, retraining cycles, and exposure logs provide tangible proof of a human-factored, living control system.
| Requirement | Operationalisation | ISO 27001 / NIS2 Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Unified audit trail | Real-time SoA logs, versioned, timestamped, assigned | A5.4, A5.35, A5.36 |
| Continuous improvement | Tracked management reviews, measurable outcomes | 9.3, 10.2, A5.27 |
| Human error/fatigue logs | Automated training reminders, review cycle metrics | A6.3, A8.7, NIS2 Art. 20 |
Audit and regulatory teams use one decisive test: can you export live records-SoA, change logs, incident reviews, asset register, control assignments-exactly as they are, in minutes? Comprehensive, living ISMSes (like ISMS.online) make this feasible; fragmentary legacy GRC tools expose operational cracks when the stakes are highest.
Are Your Controls Mapped for Real-Time Evidence-Or Are Gaps Hiding in Plain Sight?
A neatly-arranged controls list proves little if ownership is ambiguous or evidence goes stale. NIS 2 enforcement and modern audits now probe for “living” controls-every risk paired with a named person, current review, and dated, cross-referenced evidence. Lost accountability is the fastest road to hefty enforcement action.
The moment you discover a control without a clear owner or evidence of update is often the moment your audit slips out of reach.
What separates successful organisations from the rest?
- Continuous ownership and reminders: Each control or policy is mapped to an owner. Reminders and review cycles nudge the responsible person; overdue items escalate. This is not cosmetic-every missed handover or overdue review leaves a digital trail.
- Granular change logging: Each change-even a minor configuration-must be versioned with timestamped logs, owner assignment, and cross-linked evidence. “Document-level” logs are not enough: field-level traceability matters at audit.
- Integrated risk-control mapping: Modern ISMS platforms enable controls to “listen and react” to new risks, incident learnings, or supplier changes. Updates cascade automatically, avoiding the patchwork of manual updates that defeat audit trails.
| Control Type | Trigger | Evidence/SoA Example |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier segmentation | New/modified supplier | Policy update, assignment confirmation |
| Policy change | Missed review/rollback | Version log, change owner update |
| Incident remediation | Follow-up review | Incident log entry, corrective action |
| Stakeholder update | Role transfer/attrition | Assignment update, audit trail proof |
A modern ISMS like ISMS.online closes these loops, making overdue, unassigned, or outdated controls visible-and thus risks are closed before they become audit or regulatory failures.
Be NIS 2-ready from day one
Launch with a proven workspace and templates – just tailor, assign, and go.
Is Your Supply Chain Security More Than Contract Clauses?
Supply chain risk is no longer a paper exercise. Under NIS 2, every digital supplier or SaaS provider must be treated as an extending node of your own risk posture. The question has shifted from “Do we have agreements?” to “Can we prove real-time oversight, tiering, and assessment at any moment?”
Every tiered supplier is a node of risk; the only safe loop is one where evidence flows both ways-from company to vendor, and from vendor to auditor.
Key operational features demanded now:
- Evidence-driven tiering: Each supplier-whether network, SaaS, or service provider-is classified by operational impact. Periodic assessments, contract reviews, and incident drills are scheduled, logged, and versioned within your ISMS.
- Zero Trust as daily operation: Instead of “trust but verify,” enforce explicit approval at every stage-onboarding, renewal, contract change, termination, incident response. Evidence surfaces in notification logs, impact registers, incident drills-all easily cross-linked.
- Automated risk recalculation: Renewal or incident events should ripple through risk maps and control assignments, automatically updating linked records and reminders.
| Supplier Security Layer | Evidence Output | ISMS.online Record Example |
|---|---|---|
| Tiering & mapping | Registered tier, documented impact | Supplier inventory, risk register |
| Incident simulation | Drill log, response review | Incident tracker, action log |
| Contract renewal/change | Signed record, risk reassessment | Contract register, audit-suite export |
ISMS.online streamlines supplier compliance, making all reviews, notifications, actions, and records instantly exportable under audit. This digital-first approach turns supply chain security from an annual risk into ongoing, visible resilience.
How Ready Is Your Audit Trail-Are You Audit-Proof or a Scramble Away From Failure?
Surprise audits and regulatory demands under NIS 2 have redefined audit readiness. The real test is not whether you possess the right documents, but whether approvals, evidence updates, and incident reviews are accessible-with full traceability-at a moment’s notice. Scrambling signals exposed risk; audit-calibre systems are defined by instant retrieval.
An audit-ready system is the difference between resilience and regulatory jeopardy.
What proves readiness?
- Digital sign-off: Each management review, policy update, action plan, or incident is signed, versioned, and timestamped-often cryptographically-directly in the ISMS. This chain-of-custody is impossible to spoof or backdate after the fact.
- Surface unresolved tasks: Dashboards that highlight incomplete actions, expiring reviews, or outdated risks transform ongoing assurance from tick-box to live management.
- Minimise rework and duplication: By assigning every task, policy, and action, ISMS.online avoids evidence ambiguity, missed owners, and the last-minute “hunt” for missing updates.
| Audit Requirement | Platform Record | Example Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Management review signed | Approval log | Export, digital signature, meeting notes |
| Policy update documented | Version/SoA log | Change log, assignment timestamp |
| Incident response filed | Incident tracker | Root cause, corrective action, closure |
| Audit completed | Action report | Dashboard summary, sign-off evidence |
The integration of digital-first audit tools, real-time status dashboards, and change/version logs doesn’t just mitigate regulatory fines-it proves, to leadership and regulators alike, that resilience is embedded and operational.
All your NIS 2, all in one place
From Articles 20–23 to audit plans – run and prove compliance, end-to-end.
Does Your Cyber Resilience Loop Survive Scrutiny, Change, and Cross-Standard Demand?
Where once resilience was defined by passing a point-in-time audit, now it’s measured by your ability to respond, adapt, and harmonise evidence across multiple domains-security, privacy, AI governance-at pace. NIS 2, together with parallel standards, expects a “compliance loop”: sensing change, updating policies, mapping evidence, and triggering improvement-continuously.
Resilience is not a set-and-forget checklist; it thrives only in a system designed for continuous adaptation, transparent mapping, and rapid response.
How does this manifest inside a platform?
- Trigger ripple: A new supplier, control weakness, or privacy regulation triggers a ripple through risks, mapped controls, and evidence artefacts. Updates happen automatically and are traceable across every standard you follow.
- Cross-standard readiness: Modern ISMS platforms enable one-to-many mapping: a control in ISO 27001 aligns to parallel requirements in ISO 27701 (privacy), NIS 2 (resilience), or ISO 42001 (AI), allowing “single-artefact” updates and instant, standard-compliant exports.
- Continuous diagnostics: Dashboards surface overdue tasks, missed reviews, or outdated evidence-alerting teams and stakeholders before a regulator or auditor uncovers a gap.
- Evidence mapping: Every change logs responsible roles, relevant domains, and current status-so leadership, auditors, and regulators see a single, indisputable record of what’s happening.
A compliance loop built this way doesn’t just “pass” audits-it survives scrutiny, emerges stronger from incidents, and rallies confidence across stakeholders, regulators, and customers alike.
Harmonise Evidence, Audits, and Improvement in One System: ISMS.online Today
Living up to NIS 2’s requirements is only manageable with a unified compliance system. ISMS.online converges governance, risk, and compliance in a way that makes digital proof available at pace-no matter where the challenge surfaces or who’s asking.
Unified compliance-security, privacy, and even AI governance-lives or dies by its evidence. Only a single, live system makes resilience real.
What distinguishes an integrated platform?
- Real-time dashboards: Expose ownership gaps and overdue actions with clarity. Boardrooms and operational leaders share the same real-time view, closing the loop between strategic intent and tactical assurance.
- Audit-driven improvement: Every action-policy review, supplier update, incident closure-feeds an improvement cycle, timestamped, role-assigned, and tracked for completion. No more last-minute fire drills; gaps surface and close continuously.
- Evidence as a living asset: Versioned, instantly exportable artefacts-every approval, update, or action-replace static folders and ad-hoc PDFs. This transforms compliance from a drag to a durable advantage.
| ISMS.online Capability | Resilience Outcome |
|---|---|
| Integrated SoA & Asset Map | Evidence always current; zero orphan controls |
| Incident Tracker | Fast, evidence-rich response-no scramble |
| Supplier Risk Management | Live tiering, notification logs, impact maps |
| KPI & Audit Dashboards | Board-ready trust signals, trend clarity |
Here, “we’re ready” is not a claim-it’s a function of live evidence, not hope.
Take a Leadership Step: Become Resilience-Proof with ISMS.online
Regulatory pressure, board expectation, and threat velocity are converging; only those who unify leadership vision, operational excellence, and live, audit-ready evidence will continue to thrive. With ISMS.online, every persona gains:
- Clarity in role, evidence, and accountability (board, CISO, privacy, practitioner)
- Audit confidence-no rework, export at will, regulator and auditor trust
- Automated, continuous improvement and real-time dashboards-no last-minute panic
- Supply chain visibility and cross-standard resilience-security, privacy, and AI, all under a single loop
Real compliance unites leadership vision, operational excellence, and audit-proof evidence in one system. Is your digital infrastructure ready-or still hoping for the best?
If your organisation needs to demonstrate board-level clarity, operational confidence, or provable resilience, it’s time to harmonise controls, risks, and improvement within a living, dynamic ISMS. Choose a partner trusted by auditors, designed for the cross-compliance reality, and ready for tomorrow’s resilience demands.
Bring your evidence to life. Close the compliance loop. Step confidently into the NIS 2 era with ISMS.online.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does your board now demonstrate real digital infrastructure security-and meet NIS 2’s new accountability?
NIS 2 puts digital risk squarely on the board’s agenda, making executive and director-level leaders personally responsible for the ownership, monitoring, and effectiveness of critical security controls. No longer can boards treat security as a technical or operational afterthought-the directive demands evidence chains linking who owns each asset and security measure, plus regular reviews that are logged, traceable, and ready for regulator inspection. Your board must now document risk decisions, role assignments, and the outcomes of resilience tests in a way that stands up to both internal and external scrutiny (GTLaw, 2025).
Accountability moves from IT’s problem to leadership’s evidence-ready to prove at any audit.
Regulators expect proof: audit-ready dashboards that flag overdue reviews, logs showing asset ownership, and board minutes tying business strategy to resilience actions. Failing to keep a transparent, living register exposes individual board members to legal and financial penalties (CENTR, 2025). Adopting systems such as ISMS.online empowers every board meeting to seamlessly link risks, owners, controls, and resilience status-raising the bar from compliance as a checkbox to leadership as a standard.
Where do digital infrastructure breaches start-and are you able to trace, segment, and act before regulators do?
Most incidents penalised under NIS 2 don’t start with a hack-they’re rooted in poorly segmented supplier chains, oversights in cloud configurations, and staff errors exacerbated by under-training or task overload (Europol, 2025). When a breach occurs, regulators want more than a technical explanation; they expect traceability in real time: logs that show asset flows, vendor segmentation, and control ownership before-not after-the incident.
Breach root causes are now penalties waiting to happen-unless traceability is assured upstream.
Modern tools allow you to monitor incident causes (like supply chain, cloud, or insider threats), automate alerts on training fatigue, and maintain live dashboards showing which segments or partners are business-critical. Penalties tend to follow failures in supply chain management or incomplete reporting, not just the underlying technical flaw (EY, 2024). Linking ISMS.online analytics to breach origin means you can preempt fines, quickly answer audit queries, and get ahead of regulatory scrutiny with split dashboards tailored to risk tiers and supplier impact.
What new day-to-day demands does NIS 2 impose for digital infrastructure teams-and how do they impact audit readiness?
NIS 2 requires every infrastructure team to consolidate risk registers, incident logs, vendor reviews, and all compliance evidence in a real-time system-no more ad-hoc file shares or frantic evidence-email searches on audit day (ISACA, 2024). Audits now start with “show your evidence,” meaning your extraction workflow must be streamlined and instantly documentable.
What does day-to-day audit resilience look like?
- A “living register” where controls, incidents, and vendor findings are continually logged and assigned to responsible roles.
- All policies and controls are mapped to ISO 27001/NIS 2 references so proof of alignment is instant (ENISA, 2024).
- Change-of-record lineage: management reviews trigger evidence of change, and every update is versioned with owner trails.
- Structured reminders for overdue tasks or missed reviews, ensuring nothing drifts “out of sight.”
| Trigger | Action & Audit Link | ISO 27001 / NIS 2 Ref | Example Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| External audit | SoA export generated | ISO 27001 SoA; NIS2 A28 | Export, email log |
| Missed policy review | Auto-reminder, action assigned | ISO 27001 A.5; NIS2 A21 | Email, task log |
| Vendor breach | Vendor action, risk update | ISO 27001 A.15; NIS2 A21 | Register, board note |
| Incident remediation | Outcome logged, mgmt review | ISO 27001 A.16; NIS2 A23 | Remediation log |
Audit resilience means every owner, control, and incident has a rapid, auditable trail-nothing is left to memory or luck.
ISMS.online centralises these links, rendering audits a matter of minutes, not days, and positioning the entire team for proactive compliance.
How do you map core security controls to audit-proof evidence and instant regulatory response?
Regulatory expectation has shifted from partial, post-hoc evidence to fully mapped, always-accessible audit trails: each security control and policy must be linked in real time to a Statement of Applicability and living registers of evidence (ISMS.online, 2024). Dashboards drive the cycle; overdue tests and policy drift are flagged before they put the business at risk. Every event-incident, test, or update-generates a remediation entry with owner logs, closing the gap for both audits and improvement.
How to implement audit-proof mapping:
- Link every control to SoA entries, cross-referencing ISO 27001 with NIS 2 for two-way traceability.
- Set dashboards to prompt live review cycles, highlighting overdue tasks, owner lag, or evidence drift.
- Connect each event to its responsible role, remediation workflow, and proof archive-no more orphaned records.
- Ensure stakeholder logs and update histories are visible and rapidly exportable for audits or board review.
| Trigger | Update Required | Control/SoA Link | Evidence Logged |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier risk | Risk reassessment | A.15, NIS2 A21 | SoA, risk register, vendor docs |
| Missed test | Prompt, new action | A.5, NIS2 A21 | Task, reminder, status log |
| Breach event | Remediation and review | A.16, NIS2 A23 | Report, mgmt meeting minutes |
Every control must lead directly to a proof-and every incident ties to an owner and change record.
Mapping controls with ISMS.online ensures regulatory questions can be answered instantly, and evidence chains remain unbroken.
How do you move supply chain control from contract box-ticking to real-time, tiered assurance?
NIS 2 redefines supply chain security as a process of ongoing, fine-grained visibility and evidence-not just static contract files (3rdRisk, 2024). Live registers log every supplier onboarding, tier each by risk and importance, and record reviews, drills, or incidents. Critically, these registers must support instant, tier-based export to satisfy board or regulator checks (Bitkom, 2024).
What does real-time supplier assurance look like?
- Evidence is captured from onboarding and segmented by business impact or risk; critical providers may be subject to quarterly drills, while others receive periodic review.
- All comms-breach notifications, contract renewals, critical disclosures-are archived for audit-proof exports.
- Boards and auditors can immediately view open issues, prior risk status, and real-time compliance across the supply chain.
| Supplier | Tier | Policy/Segmentation | Evidence/Proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | Quarterly drills & BIA link | Drill logs, board export |
| B | 2 | Biannual review | Contract, review checklist |
| C | 3 | Contract only | Signed SLA, comms archive |
| Breached | – | Comms/notification | Regulator correspondence |
If your supply chain can’t show tiered, real-time, exportable evidence for every vendor, you’ll fail NIS 2’s new bar for assurance.
ISMS.online tracks all vendors from onboarding to audit, translating supply chain oversight into a competitive and regulatory advantage.
How do you guarantee audit trail resilience-scaling evidence from technician to board, ready for regulator or incident?
Audit resilience demands the ability to export, in real time, proof of every event-incident, remediation, role-assignment, supply chain status-across every team and time frame (ENISA, 2024, Bitdefender, 2024). Resilient evidence survives staff turnover, internal shakeups, and new regulatory requirements; every improvement or change is logged and available without delay.
Mechanics of scaleable, role-based audit resilience:
- Real-time exports enable board, regulator, or incident responders to quickly verify decisions, sign-offs, or corrective actions.
- Each event-incident, policy review, vendor breach-is two clicks from a timestamped file or export, clearly linked to its responsible owner.
- Continuous improvement logs (“lessons learned”) close the loop from problem detection to action, making the progress visible.
- Tracking rework, lost hours, and duplicate efforts allows future risk minimisation and feeds transparent board reports.
| Event | Log Export Tool | Responsible Owner | Proof Tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incident | Role/Incident philtre | Team lead | Incident audit record |
| Review | Meeting export | Board secretary | Signed-off minutes |
| Vendor breach | Vendor segment log | Risk manager | Vendor file, comms |
With ISMS.online, your audit landscape becomes export-ready-every team, every action, every moment.
Consistency and traceability are not just compliance- they are resilience in practise.
How do you close the resilience loop-integrating audit, controls, supply chain, and strategic improvement for continuous compliance?
The gold standard of NIS 2, ISO 27001, and NIST CSF is a “closed” compliance and resilience loop: dashboards and registers that tie every control update, incident, supplier engagement, audit review, and corrective action together (TÜV SÜD, 2024; D&B, 2024). True improvement comes when every problem triggers a documented task, every lesson leads to a policy or process update, and the entire loop is auditable in real time.
Delivering closure and continuity-what sets a closed loop apart?
- Dashboards surface and colour-code every log, update, review, or incident, triggering real-time alerts for process gaps or drift.
- Standards “crosswalks” are updated live to map your frameworks and expose drift or misalignment, preventing retroactive catch-up.
- Each incident spins into a lessons-learned entry, which is logged and referenced for management and board cycles.
- Board reviews, supplier logs, and audit events flow into a unified system-no silos, no blind spots.
| Trigger | Detected On | Action | Evidence/Reporting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy drift | Dashboard alert | Owner review | Scheduled board review |
| Supplier incident | BIA dashboard | Supplier comms | Risk/comms log, SoA updated |
| Process gap found | Audit/checklist | New task/remediate | Meeting log, audit record |
| Regulatory update | Framework tracker | Map controls | Crosswalk, update minutes |
Closing the loop isn’t just about passing audits-it insulates the board, operational teams, and supply chain from risk spiral, enabling visible progress and trust.
ISMS.online links every node-control, audit, vendor, review, improvement-into one actionable framework, making resilience perpetual.
Why unify evidence, audits, and improvement cycles in a single system? The ISMS.online advantage for NIS 2 compliance and resilience
Unifying NIS 2, ISO 27001, and parallel frameworks into a single system transforms compliance from a fragmented headache into a live, value-generating asset ((https://www.isms.online/features/)). Policies, evidence, supplier assessments, board reviews, and corrective actions are linked and versioned for instant retrieval, feeding improvement cycles and removing silos.
ISO 27001 to NIS 2 Bridge Table
| Expectation | Operationalisation | ISO 27001 / NIS 2 Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Proof of control ownership | Stakeholder assignment, role logs | A.5, Art 20, 28 |
| Real-time risk review | Live dashboard & audit log exports | A.6, Art 21, 23 |
| Audit/improvement evidence | Auto-versioned reviews, workflow logs | 9.2, Art 21, 28 |
| Lessons-learned, improvement | Incident logs, reviews, corrective logs | 10.1, Art 23 |
| Supply chain segmentation | Tiered register, evidence linked to BIA | A.15, Art 21, 23 |
When every audit, improvement, and review is linked and ready, compliance moves from cost to strategic resilience.
Discover how ISMS.online turns compliance into competitive advantage-integrating every loop from supply chain to boardroom, and building evidence that stands up, year after year.
